Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Paul Chaney's avatar

James, I agree with you with the caveat "it depends." By that, I mean it depends on what you're writing. In my case, I write highly technical content based on interviews with SMEs, often with heavy dialects. Much of what's said, I don't understand. (Please don't take that as a criticism... I'm sure my southern accent is difficult to understand as well.)

Because of that, I rely on Fathom (for the transcript), ChatGPT (or outlines), and Perplexity (for research). Without those assistants, I'd be lost.

I realize that my case is the exception rather than the rule. If you're telling a story containing character, conflict, and resolution, AI can still help, but it cannot replace the human voice (yet). And if you're a writer like Neela (she writes here on Substack), who shares personal stories, AI can never replace her voice.

Like I said, I agree with your premise. But I am convinced there will come a day when human-generated content and AI-generated content will, in many cases, be essentially indistinguishable.

I'd love to hear yours and others' thoughts. Feel free to push back on mine.

Expand full comment
Alex Pawlowski's avatar

Sophisticated Prompting Is Creativity

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts